Crits from profs during the presentation

LB : Describe more about what happen, how is it going to be created?
What is the relationship btw the data and the outcome? (What is the process of the translation btw the data and the outcome?)
EX: Visual is great, how do I achieve it?
Do something with the object, trick.

Like the clinical setting. It is the artifact of the future.
Reference the eternal sunshine of a spotless mind.

ML : How much does it relies on the viewers participation?
User's experience, emotion, physical relation?

RB : Visualization of emotion, coming out from me? Particiapnt bring object to look at, natural outpu+ virtual reinterpt it. Too much aritificiallity. Emotions are not static. More time based. Yes. Get a visualization from other ppl, or from other's effectres. videos, images, etc.
Emotion be evoted. I dont know how much interesting it will be in having a visualization of my emotions.

PM: Set up a private experience. Think personally about feeling. No laboratory. Capsue too tricky. Want big size image.

PP : Better to be Private as Story corp. Clinical setting is not as beautiful as the idea of capturing emotion.

Thanks for all the faculties, and also all my classmates who helped me to write down the crits.